What Are "Doctrines of Demons"?
Greek: διδασκαλίαις δαιμονίων (didaskalíais daimoníōn)
"Didaskalíais" = teachings, doctrines
"Daimoníōn" = demonic beings, spiritual forces
Doctrines of Demons are not just mistakes but spiritually motivated deceptions designed to corrupt truth and enslave people.
This will be a biblical stress test of these doctrines, strictly using the Bible itself (without relying on mainstream theological frameworks). Each doctrine will be examined using the A–F criteria:
A. Does it distort God's character?
B. Does it undermine Jesus' role?
C. Does it pervert the Gospel?
D. Does it twist Scripture?
E. Does it promote legalism or lawlessness?
F. Does it focus on experience over truth?
How to Recognize "Doctrines of Demons"
The doctrines of demons (διδασκαλίαις δαιμονίων) are not always obvious. They are designed to deceive, often appearing wise, logical, or even spiritual, but they ultimately lead people away from God’s truth.
Below are clear biblical signs and signals that help us recognize false teachings and expose demonic deception.
Doctrines of Demons Will Always Do One (or More) of These Things:
A. They Will Distort the Character of God
False Teachings About God:
Make God seem cruel and unapproachable (hyper-legalism, works-based salvation).
Make God seem passive or indifferent (soft universalism, "God loves everyone, so all are saved").
Make God seem like a cosmic servant (prosperity gospel: "God exists to bless me").
Truth:
God is both just and merciful (Exodus 34:6-7).
God does not change (Malachi 3:6).
God is sovereign, not manipulated by our desires (Romans 9:20-21).
Key Test:
Does the teaching accurately reflect God's character as revealed in Scripture and confirmed by the Holy Spirit?
B. They Will Undermine the True Nature of Jesus Christ
False Teachings About Jesus:
Deny His humanity or divinity (e.g., Jesus was just a prophet, not God’s Son).
Reduce Him to a mere example, not the Messiah (e.g., Jesus was just a good moral teacher).
Diminish His authority (e.g., "Jesus' words are outdated and need modern reinterpretation").
Truth:
Jesus is the Son of God, the Messiah (John 20:31).
Jesus is the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15).
Jesus is the only way to salvation (John 14:6).
Key Test:
Does the doctrine acknowledge Jesus as Lord and affirm His role as the only way to the Father?
C. They Will Pervert the Gospel
False Gospels:
Salvation by works — You must "earn" salvation through behavior.
Hyper-grace — You can sin without consequence because of grace.
Another gospel — Adding requirements beyond faith in Christ (e.g., secret knowledge, rituals, traditions).
Truth:
Salvation is by grace through faith, not by works (Ephesians 2:8-9).
Faith without works is dead, but works do not save (James 2:17).
There is only one true gospel (Galatians 1:6-9).
Key Test:
Does the doctrine align with the original gospel given by Jesus and the apostles, without adding or removing requirements?
D. They Will Twist or Misuse Scripture
False Use of Scripture:
Partial or misleading quotations that remove context.
Forcing interpretations to fit a doctrine, rather than seeking truth.
Using scripture to justify sin (e.g., Satan quoted Psalm 91 to Jesus in Matthew 4:6).
Truth:
Scripture must be rightly divided (2 Timothy 2:15).
God’s Word is not open to private interpretation (2 Peter 1:20-21).
False teachers distort Scripture to their own destruction (2 Peter 3:16).
Key Test:
Does the teaching use scripture in its full biblical context, or does it selectively twist verses to fit an agenda?
E. They Will Promote Legalism or License to Sin
Two Opposing False Doctrines:
Legalism (Salvation by Human Effort)
“You must follow religious laws to be saved.”
“You are only acceptable to God if you perform correctly.”
License to Sin (No Need for Holiness)
“God loves you, so sin doesn’t matter.”
“You don’t need to repent because grace covers everything.”
Truth:
We are saved by grace but called to holiness (Titus 2:11-12).
God’s commands are not burdensome (1 John 5:3).
Obedience is the evidence of true faith (John 14:15).
Key Test:
Does the doctrine lead people into true holiness, or does it trap them in religious bondage or lawlessness?
F. They Will Focus on Experience Over Truth
False Emphasis:
Feelings over faith — "If it feels right, it must be from God."
Supernatural signs over truth — Seeking miracles instead of seeking God.
Mysticism over doctrine — "Secret revelations" that contradict scripture.
Truth:
Faith is not based on feelings but on God’s promises (Hebrews 11:1).
Signs and wonders do not always mean truth (Matthew 7:22-23).
Truth is revealed by the Spirit, confirmed by Scripture (John 16:13).
Key Test:
Does the doctrine prioritize spiritual truth, or does it chase emotional experiences and mystical revelations?
A Few Examples:
“Calvinism” (Reformed Theology, Predestination, No Free Will)
Claim: God predestines some for salvation and others for damnation, and free will plays no role.
Test Results:
❌Distorts God's character — Makes Him partial and unjust (Acts 10:34).
❌Undermines Jesus' role — Contradicts His call for all to repent (2 Peter 3:9).
❌Perverts the Gospel — Removes personal responsibility for sin.
❌Twists Scripture — Misuses Romans 9 while ignoring verses about free will (Deuteronomy 30:19).
Avoids lawlessness — Teaches obedience, but discourages personal striving.
❌Focuses on experience over truth — Leads to passive faith (“God controls everything”).
Biblical Verdict: ❌ False Doctrine ❌ (Fatalism)
“Seventh-Day Adventism” (Sabbath Observance, Investigative Judgment)
Claim: The Sabbath is a mandatory sign of obedience; in 1844, Christ entered a heavenly "investigative judgment" phase.
Test Results:
❌ Distorts God’s character — Turns the Sabbath into a salvation issue (Colossians 2:16-17).
Does not undermine Jesus' role — Recognizes His sacrifice.
❌ Perverts the Gospel — Adds an extra requirement to salvation.
❌ Twists Scripture — Misinterprets Daniel 8:14 to support "investigative judgment."
Avoids lawlessness — Teaches holiness but in a rigid way.
❌ Focuses on experience over truth — Emphasizes dietary laws and Sabbatarianism over spiritual growth.
Biblical Verdict: Legalism & Extra-Biblical ❌ Judgment Doctrine
“Lutheranism” (Justification by Faith, But Retains Sacraments)
Claim: Justification is by faith alone (Sola Fide), but baptism and the Lord’s Supper have a sacramental role.
Test Results:
Does not distort God’s character — Stresses God’s grace and mercy.
Does not undermine Jesus' role — Recognizes His atonement.
❌ Perverts the Gospel — Retains sacramental practices (infant baptism) that are not biblically required.
❌ Twists Scripture — Misuses passages about baptism (e.g., Acts 2:38) to support infant baptism.
Avoids legalism — But introduces ritualistic tendencies.
❌ Focuses on experience over truth — Relies on church traditions over Holy Spirit guidance.
Biblical Verdict: Partially Biblical, But Retains Ritualism
“Reformed Theology” (Extreme Calvinism - Predestination Without Personal Responsibility)
Claim: Everything is predetermined; free will does not matter.
Test Results:
❌ Distorts God's character — Makes Him partial and unjust (Acts 10:34 – "God shows no partiality").
❌ Undermines Jesus' role — Ignores His calls for repentance (Mark 1:15).
❌ Perverts the Gospel — Reduces salvation to a mechanical process rather than relationship.
❌ Twists Scripture — Misuses Romans 9 without considering Ezekiel 18:23 ("God desires that the wicked turn and live").
Avoids lawlessness — But traps believers in fatalism.
❌ Focuses on experience over truth — Encourages passivity instead of personal responsibility.
Biblical Verdict: ❌ False Doctrine ❌ (Fatalism)
Note:
“Balance Between Condemnation and Evaluation”
I understand that terms like "False Doctrine" can be perceived as harsh or final, but they are biblically justified (Titus 1:9-11, Galatians 1:6-9).
Jesus and Paul used strong language when addressing doctrine that led people away from salvation (e.g., "Let them be accursed" – Galatians 1:8).
The A–F test is intended to push readers toward discernment, not ecumenical compromise.
However, I do see the value in framing certain critiques in a way that invites more engagement rather than immediate dismissal.
Possible Refinement:
Instead of a one-size-fits-all "False Doctrine" label, I could break down verdicts into:
"Major Concerns, but Some Biblical Alignment" (for partially biblical doctrines)
"Directly Conflicts with Scripture" (for extreme errors like Universalism, Prosperity Gospel)
Overall, my biblical test stands as accurate, structured, and grounded in scripture.
However, I do recognize that:
Some wording adjustments could be made to avoid unnecessary harshness in labeling.
Some denominations have variations that could be acknowledged better.
Clarifying the difference between subjective experience vs. Spirit-led experiences would improve theological precision.